News:

CPG Release 1.6.29
During HTML5 upload, keep pseudo blank code 200 messages from triggering error condition
added Russian language
correct failure to use theme menu icons in album manager
minor vulnerabilities mitigation

Main Menu

watermarking reduces image size?

Started by giorgio79, March 02, 2007, 12:01:48 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

giorgio79

In this thread

http://coppermine-gallery.com/forum/index.php?topic=24556.msg112995#msg112995

someone mentioned that

"If I upload a 800x600 image with the size of 500kb, it will not resize and take a lot of space on the server. I can use watermarking to avoid this issue, but this requires watermarking and I'm not sure that I want to do that."

Is this true?

Can I avoid large file sizes by watermarking pics?

Please let me know

Thank you,
Gyuri

Joachim Müller

The answer I posted on the thread you refer to is still valid:
Quote from: GauGau on December 06, 2005, 10:07:11 AM
I agree with ecto: this is not a matter of compression, but a question what algorhythm is being used to resize the images. Both GD and ImageMagick can't compete with good desktop apps when it comes to resizing, so I suggest you resize on your client (using Photoshop or similar). AFter all, GD and IM are server apps that are meant to do a quick-and-dirty job, without using too much memory, cpu load etc.
Bottom line: no, on-the-server watermarking will not improve image sizes.