coppermine-gallery.com/forum

Support => cpg1.4.x Support => Older/other versions => cpg1.4 pnCPG (Coppermine for postNuke/Zikula) => Topic started by: Wroenco on July 11, 2004, 01:17:02 PM

Title: pnCPG 1.5 Problem within postNuke
Post by: Wroenco on July 11, 2004, 01:17:02 PM
I have successfully installed 1.5 on my test site. pnCPG1.5 comes with its own latest version of Coppermine (1.2). I have created an album via the standalone route http://www.nationwide3.co.uk/pn/modules/pnCPG/coppermine/index.php, so that seems to be working fine.

Within postnuke http://www.nationwide3.co.uk/pn/ I have got the random image block working which shows the pics from the album I created externally.

I just cannot get to run the gallery within postnuke, either through the gallery menu item on left menu bar on my postnuke site, or by selecting one of the java menu items from tha random image block. The error message within postnuke says:

"Page Not Found on http://www.nationwide3.co.uk"

The Gallery link wants to invoke "http://www.nationwide3.co.uk/pn/index.php?module=pnCPG&func=main" which seems sound to me.


I am at the end of my rope having spent days triailing all the other gallery systems finally to home in on Coppermine so that I can port an established webbap portal to postnuke where the gallery is an essential feature.

Could someone please help me? Thanks.
Title: Re: pnCPG 1.5 Problem within postNuke
Post by: SzybkiStefan on July 11, 2004, 01:50:33 PM
I checked it. It looks strange.

My first idea is that you played too much with configuration.
Could you please check what do you have in first line of configuration?

(go to admin | pnGPG, in my version this line "The Location of the Coppermine installation")

The value should be: modules/pnCPG/coppermine

If I'm wrong then I will look further.

Cheers, Szybki

Title: Re: pnCPG 1.5 Problem within postNuke
Post by: Wroenco on July 11, 2004, 01:57:26 PM
Hi thanks for taking a look so soon. I didn't change the configuration initially, but I tried the full URL to pnCPG to see if that worked. It dodn't so I changed it back. So:

(https://coppermine-gallery.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nationwide3.co.uk%2Fn3images%2FpnCPG.jpg&hash=f1904000a214a9ac14d09d1cb3948238206b9028)
Title: Re: pnCPG 1.5 Problem within postNuke
Post by: SzybkiStefan on July 11, 2004, 02:02:45 PM
In this case this is even more strange.

I'm using version 2.0 of pnCPG and it works perfectly with C 1.2. I'm only one of users so I do not have any test environment. Thus - if possible - I will ask you to install this newer version and than we can come back to the issue.

The latest version of pnCPG you can find in the other today's message from CasNuy.
Title: Re: pnCPG 1.5 Problem within postNuke
Post by: Wroenco on July 11, 2004, 02:06:04 PM
Doh! Just looking at that image I saw that it had use postwrap on. I removed that and it now seems to work. I realise that it uses iframe. So it's going to take a deal of customisation to blend with my site!

Thanks.
Title: Re: pnCPG 1.5 Problem within postNuke
Post by: SzybkiStefan on July 11, 2004, 02:15:43 PM
Oh, yeah.
This could be an issue too. But I don't use PostWrap and I have it off.
Title: Re: pnCPG 1.5 Problem within postNuke
Post by: Joachim Müller on July 11, 2004, 03:01:46 PM
Quote from: Wroenco on July 11, 2004, 01:17:02 PM
I have successfully installed 1.5 on my test site. pnCPG1.5 comes with its own latest version of Coppermine (1.2).
Just FYI: CPG1.2 is not the most recent version of coppermine.

GauGau
Title: Re: pnCPG 1.5 Problem within postNuke
Post by: Wroenco on July 11, 2004, 03:03:56 PM
Quote from: GauGau on July 11, 2004, 03:01:46 PM
Quote from: Wroenco on July 11, 2004, 01:17:02 PM
I have successfully installed 1.5 on my test site. pnCPG1.5 comes with its own latest version of Coppermine (1.2).
Just FYI: CPG1.2 is not the most recent version of coppermine.

GauGau

I know of a 1.3 beta, is that now a production release?
Title: Re: pnCPG 1.5 Problem within postNuke
Post by: Joachim Müller on July 11, 2004, 03:06:12 PM
yes, cpg1.3.0 (stable) has been released on 2004-06-10, see http://forum.coppermine-gallery.net/index.php?topic=6829.0
There are however some minor issues that need fixing, so there will be cpg1.3.1 pretty soon.

GauGau
Title: Re: pnCPG 1.5 Problem within postNuke
Post by: Wroenco on July 11, 2004, 03:30:34 PM
Thanks for the info.
Title: Re: pnCPG 1.5 Problem within postNuke
Post by: casNuy on July 11, 2004, 05:37:12 PM
Also pnCPG 1.5 is not the latest version. Version 2.0 has more features. As already mentioned by SzybkiStefan , version 2.1 Beta  is available on this board and will be released shortly.

Cas
Title: Re: pnCPG 1.5 Problem within postNuke
Post by: Wroenco on July 22, 2004, 03:38:58 AM
Quote from: SzybkiStefan on July 11, 2004, 02:02:45 PM
In this case this is even more strange.

I'm using version 2.0 of pnCPG and it works perfectly with C 1.2. I'm only one of users so I do not have any test environment. Thus - if possible - I will ask you to install this newer version and than we can come back to the issue.

The latest version of pnCPG you can find in the other today's message from CasNuy.

Hi,

Your version 2. Does it include a version of Coppermine, or is it simply the 35Kb hack?

I am supposing that you have a full version. If so could I download it from you as I have a usergalleries not paging problem. I am told to use V2.0 but cannot find it and casNuy seems too busy. I am told to install version 1.3 of coppermine for pn but the install process is just too buggy.

many thanks,

Wroenco
Title: Re: pnCPG 1.5 Problem within postNuke
Post by: Wroenco on July 27, 2004, 10:45:39 PM
Invitation to Casper to read and digest. Learn some manners buddy.
Title: Re: pnCPG 1.5 Problem within postNuke
Post by: Tarique Sani on July 28, 2004, 05:08:39 AM
@Wroenco : Your needling Casper here is entirely unwarranted, I have followed your other thread and you have still not demonstrated the problem to us in Coppermine Standalone version and  as far as I can read in the above this there there is nothing to read and digest for Casper.

I will stick to the technical facts and not detail *your* attitude with adjectives. I would strongly recommend you do the same.