How do I hide the 'random files' and 'last edition' tables... How do I hide the 'random files' and 'last edition' tables...
 

News:

cpg1.5.48 Security release - upgrade mandatory!
The Coppermine development team is releasing a security update for Coppermine in order to counter a recently discovered vulnerability. It is important that all users who run version cpg1.5.46 or older update to this latest version as soon as possible.
[more]

Main Menu

How do I hide the 'random files' and 'last edition' tables...

Started by sanax, June 11, 2006, 09:31:48 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

sanax

... I see these two galleries show up on each page?! Can I hide it? I looked through the settings etc. but seems to me I can't hide it from the index and other pages...

Any suggestions?... or do I miss something simple here?

Tranz


ipoe

maybe my answer is more productive than "read the faq" but in general its a good idea to have a look at the documentation  ;D

login as admin
goto config
expand album list  and have a look at
The content of the main page

iPoe

sanax

Quote from: ipoe on June 11, 2006, 09:36:37 PM
maybe my answer is more productive than "read the faq" but in general its a good idea to have a look at the documentation  ;D

login as admin
goto config
expand album list  and have a look at
The content of the main page

iPoe


Thank you iPoe... your description was much better! It took me a while to figure it! Thanks for your effort!... I appreciate it!

Paver

If you click on the FAQ link at the top of this page, then use your browser's search function and type in "random", you'll see that there is a frequently-asked question with a detailed answer about this very question.

This is as productive as any answer but the difference is that it is more educational for future questions you might have.

Tranz

Quote from: ipoe on June 11, 2006, 09:36:37 PM
maybe my answer is more productive than "read the faq" but in general its a good idea to have a look at the documentation  ;D
It's nice that you try to help, but it's uncalled for to comment on the support of others. If I or any of the more long time supporters provided "productive" replies for every repeated question that is already answered in the docs/forums, we either would have no time for life outside the forums, or would be able to answer fewer support requests.

Let's see you try to answer every single one of those 'read the docs' threads with a completely detailed reply. Once you get to my post count (currently 5243), you can come back and say something.

sanax

Quote from: TranzNDance on June 11, 2006, 10:04:37 PM
It's nice that you try to help, but it's uncalled for to comment on the support of others. If I or any of the more long time supporters provided "productive" replies for every repeated question that is already answered in the docs/forums, we either would have no time for life outside the forums, or would be able to answer fewer support requests.

Let's see you try to answer every single one of those 'read the docs' threads with a completely detailed reply. Once you get to my post count (currently 5243), you can come back and say something.

Maybe you should look for another job! No need to be nasty if you're one of the developers!!

sanax

Quote from: Paver on June 11, 2006, 09:51:59 PM
If you click on the FAQ link at the top of this page, then use your browser's search function and type in "random", you'll see that there is a frequently-asked question with a detailed answer about this very question.

This is as productive as any answer but the difference is that it is more educational for future questions you might have.

Thank you Paver!! I'll do that in the future! :)

Tranz

Quote from: sanax on June 11, 2006, 10:34:19 PM
Maybe you should look for another job! No need to be nasty if you're one of the developers!!
It's not a job. I volunteer to help those who ask valid questions. It's ungrateful lazy users like you who irritate supporters.

Paver

Let's sum up. 

When a supporter says "read the FAQ", that means the supporter knows that the question asked is in the FAQ.
When a supporter says "read the docs", that means the same thing for the docs.

It does *not* mean that the supporter is lazy.  Either one of those responses is a perfectly valid & helpful response.  You can follow up of course if your question is not perfectly answered.

Please learn how to use your browser's find/search function.