diffrent image sizes. diffrent image sizes.
 

News:

cpg1.5.48 Security release - upgrade mandatory!
The Coppermine development team is releasing a security update for Coppermine in order to counter a recently discovered vulnerability. It is important that all users who run version cpg1.5.46 or older update to this latest version as soon as possible.
[more]

Main Menu

diffrent image sizes.

Started by nish, December 29, 2007, 09:45:16 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

nish

hi...
       i would like to suggest that if possible a admin tool should be added to a picture can have diffrent resolutions. so user only upload the large picture size and the image is scale down to diffrent resultions that can fit fine for mobiles, TFT monitors. Wide screen monitors (Ex. Diffrent resulutions for diffrent screens). a administrator or a power user should be allowed to choose what resolutions he/she need.

At the time of upload there should be checkbox like system. asking what resulution you want. there may be some fix resolutions set by admin or some text box to ask user to enter value in px.

i hope this can be added as now days many users access net via there mobiles/smart phones. so it can be handy for them.

2)  the gallery must be WAP compitable. so can work with mobile phones.

Thanks
Nish

Joachim Müller

Would be a bloat feature imo. There is a plugin available though that does what you're after: "Download Resized - resize img to user defined values and offer download"

nish

Thanks Sir,
            i will try is mode pack. what about the second request giving gallery a WAP Compatibility so can be viewed via mobile devices. with wap brawsers. including image download to device feature.

Thanks
Nish

Joachim Müller

Well, first of all: we have a strict "one issue per thread" policy that agreed to respect when signing up. So your second suggestion should have gone into this thread, but a separate one.
WAP compatibility would mean designinging a custom theme of your own, so you're welcome to go ahead and do just that. WAP is dead in my opinion - nobody wants a crippled www page on mobiles, especially not something related to multimedia on a medium that is by design limited and not ideal to display multimedia content. So if you must hear it: your second request is turned down.
Keep in mind as well that there is no support on the feature requests board - the feature requests board is meant for suggestions, so you can't expect answers.