batch upload vs. album ownership batch upload vs. album ownership
 

News:

cpg1.5.48 Security release - upgrade mandatory!
The Coppermine development team is releasing a security update for Coppermine in order to counter a recently discovered vulnerability. It is important that all users who run version cpg1.5.46 or older update to this latest version as soon as possible.
[more]

Main Menu

batch upload vs. album ownership

Started by adameros, October 11, 2005, 06:00:24 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Print
Go Down Pages1
User actions

adameros

October 11, 2005, 06:00:24 PM Last Edit: October 12, 2005, 07:32:57 AM by GauGau
Batch upload was broken, so Saturday Oct. 1st I upgraded to the latest CVS version which does allow me to do batch uploads (as long the directory of images is not too large).

It used to be in 1.3.X that the owner of an album could perform operations (like rotate) on any image in that album. This does not seem to be the case with 1.4.X. I did a batch upload of image to my Father's album, but he could not rotate any of his images, with Coppermine complainning that he does not own the images in his album.

It would be nice if both the album owner and the image owner could have rights to edit images.

Thanks!  :)

Joachim Müller

#1
October 12, 2005, 07:32:47 AM
ownership is determined by who uploaded the files, not by "who owns the album". The user galleries are suppossed to be updated by the user. The admin is not suppossed to be uploading to them. Crop & rotate should be done on the client anyway before uploading. In fact, you're not reporting a bug imo, but request an additional feature. This is hardly possible, as there has been a feature freeze for cpg1.4.x.
Marking this thread as "invalid".
Print
Go Up Pages1
User actions