[Solved]: BBCODE URL not obeyed in thumbnail view [Solved]: BBCODE URL not obeyed in thumbnail view
 

News:

CPG Release 1.6.26
Correct PHP8.2 issues with user and language managers.
Additional fixes for PHP 8.2
Correct PHP8 error with SMF 2.0 bridge.
Correct IPTC supplimental category parsing.
Download and info HERE

Main Menu

[Solved]: BBCODE URL not obeyed in thumbnail view

Started by mikesalway, October 24, 2008, 07:15:24 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

mikesalway

Hi guys

When I put URL in the description of an image, it doesn't display the link properly in the thumbnail view, but it does in the individual image view.

eg:
http://www.mikesalway.com.au/gallery/thumbnails.php?album=54
The first image on this view, "Featured on SpaceWeather" is not showing the link.
But if you go into the image:
http://www.mikesalway.com.au/gallery/displayimage.php?pos=-790

It does show the linked text as actual links.

Is this a theme issue or something else?
I seem to remember it working properly in 1.3.something.

Thanks


mikesalway

Many thanks. I searched for almost exactly that title but didn't find anything :/ Must've been hidden amongst all the theme search results.

It is showing links now:
http://www.mikesalway.com.au/gallery/thumbnails.php?album=54

But it's done something weird with the formatting, which is all spaced out and much different to the image description:
http://www.mikesalway.com.au/gallery/displayimage.php?pos=-790

The description text is simply:
Best frames from a capture on the 17/10/2008
Featured on [url=http://www.spaceweather.com/archive.php?month=10&day=21&year=2008&view=view]SpaceWeather October 21[/url]
Featured on [url=http://fr.astronomycamerasblog.com/2008/10/20/images-diss-et-nouveau-site-de-mike-salway/]French Astronomy Cameras Blog[/url]



Joachim Müller

Quote from: mikesalway on October 24, 2008, 07:59:33 AM
But it's done something weird with the formatting, which is all spaced out and much different to the image description
That's not surprising, as other CSS classes are being applied. Is your above remark meant to be a question? I can't see anything "weird" though.


mikesalway