[Invalid]: Is there a solution for redirecting

[ct1]

http://www.texashotboats.com/gallery/

Is there a solution for redirecting back to gallery when bridging smf 2.0 rc1 yet by chance?  It still redirects to the forum.

Thank You

ct1

[Jeff Bailey]

Please follow this -> http://coppermine-gallery.net/demo/cpg14x/docs/index.htm#integrating_support_start

[ct1]

I have read all that and searched site, and other sites for a while.

I have experienced it working correctly on smf 1.1 and older.  After smf came out with 2.0 the redirect back to the gallery does not work.  Has anyone found simple solution for this? Thank you in advance.

[Jeff Bailey]

from the link

    * When requesting bridge support, please post a link to your site, a test user account, and what you have set in the bridge manager.
      Make sure that the test user account doesn't have admin privileges. When posting parts of your bridge file, make sure to replace passwords with asterisks.
       
      This is how your posting should look like (with actual URLs instead of the dummy URLs given here as an example):

      I have the following issue when trying to bridge coppermine and XXX:
      [error message here]

      Coppermine install: http://mysite.tld/my_coppermine_folder/
      Forum install: http://mysite.tld/my_forum_folder/
      Coppermine version: cpg1.4.25
      Forum version: SuperDuper BBS app v0.8.15
      Test user account: some_testuser_name / the_password_for_the_test_user_account

      BridgeManager settings:
      Forum URL:  http://mysite.tld/test/foo_bar
      Relative path to your BBS's config file:  ../bla/
      Use post-based groups?:  0 

[Joachim Müller]

Redirection after login is a feature of the application you bridge with: if that application has got that feature, then fine. If it doesn't have that feature, then there's nothing we can do about that. The idea of bridging is that the application you bridge with takes over control over then user management, authentification and login process. Coppermine no longer controls that process. That's why we can't find a solution for what you're requesting. Instead, you'd have to ask that at Simple Machines instead. So no, there is no such solution as far as I know. And there will be no solution from our side, because we can't come up with such a solution: we don't have control over the code of the app you bridge with, and we will not advise users to change the code of third party apps.
Marking your thread accordingly.
In the future, please do as supporters suggest instead of arguing about the need to do so.