Need a couple of pointers on Bridge development.

[gram]

Moderators:  Please move this thread to its appropriate location if I have posted in the wrong place.

I head up a team of code developers that are working to create a site management utility that will provide seamless user, session and cookie management for web developers.  This utility creates a singular login for mutiple scripts, and common methods for cookie and session management.  It also leaves original scripts intact allowing for full usage of those scripts as the designers intended.

So heres the question:  Will CPG bridge specs allow for coppermine to be bridged, and still retain full user configurability for the admins?  I have only looked deaply into the Mambo Bridge for 1.4, but we have both 1.3 and 1.4 running on our dev servers.  With this specific bridge, the admins cannot individually set a users allocated space, only space for a group is allowed.  It also refers user profile requests to the Mambo scripts, while we would rather have them go to CPGs internal functions.

Can anyone point me to a bridge that allows for this type of functionaility?  Direct answers are not required, just need a pointer to some example code.

Thanks,

GRAM

 

[Joachim Müller]

none of the bridges allows this, as it's not a feature built into coppermine: you can't assign quota by user in coppermine, only by group (bridged or not).

[gram]

Thanks GauGau!

GRAM