Problem with "Registered user" Problem with "Registered user"
 

News:

cpg1.5.48 Security release - upgrade mandatory!
The Coppermine development team is releasing a security update for Coppermine in order to counter a recently discovered vulnerability. It is important that all users who run version cpg1.5.46 or older update to this latest version as soon as possible.
[more]

Main Menu

Problem with "Registered user"

Started by Joell, December 06, 2006, 08:35:50 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Print
Go Down Pages1
User actions

Joell

December 06, 2006, 08:35:50 PM
Hi,

yesterday, i set up coppermine on my webserver and it works just fine. but now i have a serious problem. private party pictures should be viewed by anyone who hast just registered. but i have some other groups like family and friends. the problem now is that when i assign someone as first group to friends, there is no checkbox for assigning them as second group to registered. so they won't see the private party pics...
i could assign them as primary group to registered an as second to friends, but that would compromise their rights and uploadspace as well..,. and also it would display them as "registered" but i want them to be displayed as "friends" or "family"... the thing is that new registered users want to see private party pics instantly and don't want to wait until i assign them to a special usergroup.. because of that i assigned the private party pics to registered user... it would be nice when a user is always a registered one when logged in, no matter what he is assigned in primary or secondary group....

i hope you understand my problem.. sry for the bad english.. it's not my native...^^

Joachim Müller

#1
December 07, 2006, 06:14:22 AM Last Edit: December 07, 2006, 11:36:55 PM by GauGau
Quote from: Joell on December 06, 2006, 08:35:50 PM
i could assign them as primary group to registered an as second to friends
That's exactly what you should do
Quote from: Joell on December 06, 2006, 08:35:50 PMbut that would compromise their rights and uploadspace as well
Not correct: least restrictive permissions apply: if the secondary group has higher privileges apply, i.e. membership in th group "friends" even as secondary group will do what you want.
Quote from: Joell on December 06, 2006, 08:35:50 PMand also it would display them as "registered" but i want them to be displayed as "friends" or "family".
Small drawback if you ask me - they hardly will notice imo.
Quote from: Joell on December 06, 2006, 08:35:50 PMthe thing is that new registered users want to see private party pics instantly and don't want to wait until i assign them to a special usergroup.
Will be the case with above mentioned setup
Quote from: Joell on December 06, 2006, 08:35:50 PMit would be nice when a user is always a registered one when logged in
That's the case exactly.

Joell

#2
December 07, 2006, 11:21:21 PM
Quote
Quotebut that would compromise their rights and uploadspace as well
Not correct: least restrictive permissions apply: if the secondary group has higher privileges apply, i.e. membership in th group "friends" even as secondary group will do what you want.

hmm i have a group friends, which are allowed to upload 4MB. registered user can upload just 1MB. if i assign a user in primary to registered and in secondary to friends, the user is allowed to upload 1MB only... why is that?

Joachim Müller

#3
December 07, 2006, 11:38:13 PM
Unable to replicate. Post a link and non-admin test user account, with the test user account being member of the friends groups.
Print
Go Up Pages1
User actions