not sure if this is still a bug? not sure if this is still a bug?
 

News:

cpg1.5.48 Security release - upgrade mandatory!
The Coppermine development team is releasing a security update for Coppermine in order to counter a recently discovered vulnerability. It is important that all users who run version cpg1.5.46 or older update to this latest version as soon as possible.
[more]

Main Menu

not sure if this is still a bug?

Started by gazraa, December 08, 2003, 09:56:56 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

gazraa

At some stage during the upgrades, the cpg_installs table was created as 'cpg_installs'

Now, I use a prefix on all my tables of smccnuke_

the installs table did not use this prefix when it was set up, every other table did, and when i do the rc5 upgrade it is searching for smccnuke_cpg_installs which obviously isn't there.

Everything else runs fine, and I did the two updates on the installs table manually. But is this a bug? Has anyone else used prefixes on their tables and had the same problem?

DJMaze

it's impossible that install.php searches for smccnuke_cpg_installs because it's never used that way.
Only cpg_installs table is asked
There are 2 kinds of users in this world: satisfied and complainers.
Why do we never hear something from the satisfied users?
http://coppermine-gallery.net/forum/index.php?topic=24315.0

gazraa

well when i ran the install for rc5, i got two red dots come up and it was for the alter table and update table, and for both it was looking for smccnuke_cpg_installs

i had to manually run the sql with just cpg_installs as the install name

DJMaze

ah now i get it, and found.

you upgrade from rc3/4 to 1.2.1 bug will be solved.

Thanks a lot
There are 2 kinds of users in this world: satisfied and complainers.
Why do we never hear something from the satisfied users?
http://coppermine-gallery.net/forum/index.php?topic=24315.0